Gently down the (angry) stream

Major Tributaries and rivers, trans-boundary sources
I recently picked up this book called “Rivers of Life”, a critical review of the Flood Action Plan (FAP) in Bangladesh by local journalists. The FAP is a multimillion dollar, ambitious disaster-mitigation strategy undertaken by the Bangladeshi government since the last decade. It was initiated after two major floods in 1987 and 1988. I found it quite a refreshing read aside from the usual run of the mill government, NGO and academic reports because of it includes not just success stories, but failures as well.
Same flood, different perceptions
“English only has one word, flood, whereas Bangla has two: flood is either called barsha (normal flood) or banya (abnormal flood)”
Through foreigners’ eyes (I’m a guilty party as well), floods are problems, and flood waters a nuisance meant to be disposed of as quickly as possible. Western intervention to the FAP actually proved more disasterous than beneficial, turning once arable farm lands into permanent drylands for flood intolerant, western style agriculture. From the farmer, fishermen, women workers, boatmen, urban elites, military, agronomists and gov. officials, floods mean diff things. Essentially disaster mitigation is a power play among diff interests groups, not just within Bangladesh, but also with its neighbours.
On roving rivers
My first contact with such a phenomenon was in Eastern Nepal, covering a post-Kosi flood conditions story. Around August 2008, the Sapta Kosi River (Sapta means 7 in Nepali, 7 tributaries) which is a transboundary water way between India and Nepal, one of the Ganges’s biggest tributaries, reversed its course. What I saw when I visited the flood affected areas was bewildering- vast tracts of land which used to be river beds now stand dry, while those parts now filled with water used to be settlement areas. It wasn’t hard to imagine the horror, the scale of nightmarish destruction, even though it was almost 1 year since the river breached its embankments.

A flood ravaged village in PaschimKusa, Nepal after Kosi River changed its course overnight
<

Temporary shelter, Kosi flood affected area, April 2009

Eye infections, like what this boy had, were common among people who lived in shelters on sandy, desert like land (which used to be the river bed)
Scary no? Roving rivers. It’s just unthinkable to be living with so much uncertainty, i mean to build your home near a ticking time bomb, with virtually no strong warning systems in place except that of nature. (eg. animals scurrying into houses) But rich alluvial soils near rivers are just too valuable to give up on. So for Bangladesh’s case, roving rivers are unfortunately a big problem, with the Brahmaputra shifting 100km westwards in the past two centuries. There’s a lot of geography involved, like how Bangladesh’s river source originates from Himalayas, one of the youngest mountain systems. And reason for rivers’ instability is due to the large amt of sediments that the 237 rivers carry downstream, 2 billion tonnes a year in total! Intriguing..
Murky political waters
I got the impression that water politics is quite a major issue in international relations among Southasia when I was in Nepal. Nepal always seems to suffer great thirst despite its amazing geography of mountains and river systems, and locals often point the finger of blame at India for controlling water sources in dam building projects for their own benefits and giving others the shorter end of the stick. These same arguements were also levelled at India from Bangladesh, which is geographically disadvantaged due to it being the furthest down away from Himalayan river sources. The establishment of Farakka Barrage at the Ganges just before it enters Bangladesh, for instance, has long been a point of contention for both countries because rivers, agriculture, and life around it means so much in economic terms.
It’s really tough, I feel, managing rivers and mitigating floods. Should it be more before the fact preventive or after the fact mitigation? And as for preventive measures, how so such that you don’t upset the delicate ecological balance and still be sustainable and lasting? When you tamper with nature, it’ll bite back with two times the vengeance.
And how so, when a cyclone comes every now and then to sweep away all the foundations and efforts?
Has flood and disaster migation lowered in priority in this climate of global financial recession?
A Nepali journalist once said she wished to specialize in the “water beat”, even furthering her studies in that. It seemed like a very obscure idea to me back then, but now I could totally understand -I could practically spend an entire life time reporting on water issues, but now i only have a week or two’s time.